Published September 25, 2024
In this article
The options become narrowed down to the two most widely used web servers, and the common question arises for SMEs here: who’s better? NGINX or Apache? According to W3Techs, as of July 2024, NGINX is used by 34.0% of all websites whose web server is known, while Apache holds about 29.3% of the market share. This prominence is attributed to their ability to handle high traffic efficiently and their exceptional flexibility.
To understand their current positions, it's valuable to review how these web servers have evolved over time. In October 2020, Apache was leading with a market share of 36.2%, compared to NGINX’s 32.4%. This data highlights the crucial role both technologies play in the web hosting industry. This blog will provide an extended review of the two servers, NGINX and Apache, that are designed to assist SMEs.
At its core, a web server is an application that delivers web content to clients through the World Wide Web. It is involved in transactions between the web client, for example, a net browser, and sends and serves Web pages, images, etc. SMBs depend on web servers as the foundation of any online business, and that is why it is important to make sure that these web servers are reliable, as they must be able to provide fast, secure and always available websites to consumers. These servers host websites, web applications, and APIs, which are essential components of SMBs' online operations.
To assist SMBs in selecting the most suitable web server technology, the following table compares several top options based on key parameters:
Web Server | Ease of Use | Performance | Security Features | Scalability | Cost | Why It’s Best for SMBs |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NGINX | Moderate | High | Robust | Excellent | Open-source | High performance and low resource usage |
Apache | High | Moderate | Strong | Good | Open-source | Flexible configuration and wide module support |
LiteSpeed | Easy | High | Excellent | Excellent | Paid | Fast, efficient, and great for high-traffic |
Microsoft IIS | Moderate | High | Strong | Good | Paid | Seamless integration with Windows environments |
Caddy | Easy | Moderate | Excellent | Good | Open-source | Automatic HTTPS and simple configuration |
Both NGINX and Apache have risen to prominence in the web server market due to their flexibility and superior handling of high traffic. Notably, NGINX excels in speed during high loads due to its event-driven model, which efficiently processes multiple requests simultaneously. In contrast, Apache is favoured for its flexibility and extensive module support, allowing for customisation to meet specific needs. Both servers have strong communities and extensive documentation, making them accessible and reliable choices for SMEs.
NGINX employs an asynchronous, non-blocking, event-driven architecture. It can handle multiple connections from one thread, making it very efficient and able to practically support thousands of connections with little memory use.
Conversely, Apache utilizes a process-driven model, managing each request with a separate thread or process. This can lead to higher memory consumption under heavy load but allows for greater flexibility and easier debugging.
NGINX generally outperforms Apache in serving static content thanks to its efficient handling of multiple connections. It serves static files directly and with minimal overhead. Regarding dynamic content, both servers perform admirably, though the choice may depend on the specific application stack and configuration.
1. Traffic Volume and Performance Needs: If your website expects high traffic and you need exceptional performance and low resource usage, NGINX might be the better choice due to its event-driven architecture. However, if flexibility and extensive module support are more important for your application, Apache could be preferable.
2. Ease of Configuration and Management: Evaluate your team’s familiarity with server configuration. Apache’s support for htaccess files allows for easier directory-level configuration, which might be beneficial for teams who need to manage multiple sites or configurations. NGINX’s centralised configuration might appeal to those who prefer a single configuration file for management.
3. Security Considerations: Both servers offer strong security features, but they handle updates and vulnerabilities differently. Consider how your organisation plans to manage updates and security patches. Apache has a long history of strong security features and extensive documentation, while NGINX’s minimal attack surface and regular updates might appeal to those prioritising high security.
4. Application Stack and Compatibility: Think about the technologies and languages your web applications use. Apache integrates seamlessly with traditional LAMP stacks and various scripting languages, while NGINX works well with modern technologies and can be used effectively with FastCGI.
5. Scalability and Resource Usage: If you need to scale efficiently and handle many simultaneous connections with minimal resource usage, NGINX’s architecture might be advantageous. Apache, while capable, may require more resources under heavy load.
6. Budget and Licensing: Both NGINX and Apache are open-source and free to use, but you should consider any additional costs related to support, plugins, or premium features if applicable.
Considering these factors will help you make a well-informed decision on which web server best aligns with your organization’s goals and requirements.
For SMEs, selecting the right web server is essential to achieving optimal performance and reliability. NGINX and Apache are both excellent choices, each with its strengths. NGINX stands out for its performance and efficiency, whereas Apache is known for its flexibility and ease of configuration. Understanding these differences and capabilities will enable SMEs to choose the server that best meets their specific needs or to hire top dedicated offshore developers from a reliable partner for expert guidance and support.
Related Blogs
How we make sure which candidate would be able to add values to your projects?
Check Now