10 Fiverr and Upwork Alternatives To Hire Software Developers
In this article
In today’s technology-driven world, many organisations are turning to offshore software developers as a strategic move to accelerate growth and manage costs effectively. While platforms like Fiverr and Upwork have been popular sources for freelance talent, they come with certain limitations. As a result, there is a growing need for more reliable and specialised alternatives. This blog aims to explore the best Fiverr and Upwork Alternatives for hiring offshore software developers. We will detail what each alternative offers, their benefits, and why they might be a better choice for your hiring needs.
Problems With Sites Like Fiverr & Upwork
Regarding the choice of such platforms, Fiverr and Upwork have to be mentioned, yet they also have some disadvantages. Common issues include:- Quality Control: Given the fact that a large number of freelancers are involved, it often becomes difficult to keep up with the quality. Since you have to vet the candidates on your own, it is also a time-consuming and tedious task.
- Delay In Timeline & Real-time Communication: Coordination and real-time communication could also be challenging because people from different time zones and speakers of different languages are usually involved.
- Security Concerns: Accomplishing the protection of ideas and confidential information can also be challenging.
- Hidden Costs: These are usually in the form of extra charges and other commissions that raise project costs to a new high. With most projects, you often end up paying more than the initially agreed-upon amount.
- Limited Screening: There might be problems with the selection of freelancers, as clients can face situations when the chosen talent does not meet their expectations or has inadequate qualifications.
- Long-Term Flexibility and Reliability: Platforms like Fiverr and Upwork often cater to short-term projects, making it difficult to ensure long-term commitment and reliability. This can be a drawback for businesses that require ongoing support or a stable development partner.
- Less Integration with Internal Teams: Freelancers from these platforms can sometimes struggle to integrate seamlessly with internal teams. This lack of cohesion can lead to communication gaps and inefficiencies, impacting the overall project workflow.
- Divided Attention On Multiple Projects: Freelancers often juggle multiple projects simultaneously, which can lead to divided attention and inconsistent delivery of work. Hiring a dedicated individual ensures better focus and higher quality in the delivery of work.
Fiverr vs Upwork vs Dedicated Offshore Developer Hiring Partner: Who Wins The Race & Why
Criteria | Fiverr | Upwork | Dedicated Offshore Developer Hiring Partner |
---|---|---|---|
Pros |
|
|
|
Cons |
|
|
|
Top 10 Fiverr and Upwork Alternatives
Smart Working
Foundation Year: 2020
Hourly Rate: $24 - $60
Tech Stack: JavaScript, Python, Java, C#, PHP, Ruby on Rails, and 100+ more.
Statistics: 96% client retention rate, 1500+ projects completed
Pros:
- Highly vetted developers ensure high-quality work.
- Strong project management support improves project efficiency.
- Flexible engagement models cater to different project needs.
- A high client retention rate indicates customer satisfaction.
- Broad tech stack covers a wide range of programming languages and technologies.
Cons:
- Higher initial costs compared to other platforms.
- Limited to specific regions, potentially reducing talent availability.
- Smaller talent pool compared to global platforms.
- The onboarding process may take longer due to thorough vetting.
- It may not be suitable for very small or one-off projects due to cost.
Comparison Table: Smart Working vs Fiverr vs Upwork
Criteria | Smart Working | Fiverr | Upwork |
---|---|---|---|
Vetting Process | Rigorous | Minimal | Comprehensive |
Quality Consistency | High | Variable | High |
Project Management | Included | Not included | Optional |
Cost Efficiency | Moderate | Low | Moderate |
Client Retention | 95% | 60% | 75% |
2. Toptal
Foundation Year: 2010
Hourly Rate: $60 - $150
Tech Stack: JavaScript, Python, Ruby, PHP, C++, and more.
Statistics: 98% success rate, used by Fortune 500 companies
Pros:
- Access to the top 3% of freelancers ensures exceptional talent.
- An extensive screening process guarantees high-quality candidates.
- Robust client support helps manage projects effectively.
- Used by Fortune 500 companies, indicating reliability.
- A high success rate reflects positive client outcomes.
Cons:
- Higher cost compared to many other platforms.
- Smaller talent pool due to selective vetting.
- May not be cost-effective for smaller projects.
- Limited availability for non-technical roles.
- Longer onboarding process due to rigorous vetting.
Comparison Table: Toptal vs Fiverr vs Upwork
Criteria | Toptal | Fiverr | Upwork |
---|---|---|---|
Vetting Process | Very rigorous | Minimal | Comprehensive |
Quality Consistency | Very high | Variable | High |
Project Management | Optional | Not included | Optional |
Cost Efficiency | High | Low | Moderate |
Client Retention | 98% | 60% | 75% |
3. Guru
- Foundation Year: 1998
- Hourly Rate: $25 - $100
- Tech Stack: PHP, Python, Java, C#, JavaScript, and more.
- Statistics: Over 3 million users, $250 million paid to freelancers
Pros:
- A large pool of freelancers provides diverse talent options.
- Flexible payment terms cater to different project needs.
- A secure workroom for project management enhances collaboration.
- Competitive pricing can be cost-effective.
- Established platform with a long history and large user base.
Cons:
- Quality can vary significantly among freelancers.
- Less focused on the vetting process compared to other platforms.
- Higher competition among freelancers can lead to variable pricing.
- Project management support is less robust.
- It may require more effort to find top-quality talent.
Comparison Table: Guru vs Fiverr vs Upwork
Criteria | Guru | Fiverr | Upwork |
---|---|---|---|
Vetting Process | Moderate | Minimal | Comprehensive |
Quality Consistency | Moderate | Variable | High |
Project Management | Included | Not included | Optional |
Cost Efficiency | High | Low | Moderate |
Client Retention | 70% | 60% | 75% |
4. PeoplePerHour
- Foundation Year: 2007
- Hourly Rate: $20 - $100
- Tech Stack: PHP, JavaScript, Python, Java, Ruby, and more.
- Statistics: 1.5 million freelancers, 1 million businesses
Pros:
- Flexible hiring options provide versatility.
- Comprehensive freelancer profiles aid in selection.
- The easy-to-use interface simplifies the hiring process.
- A large number of freelancers are available.
- Established platform with a significant user base.
Cons:
- It can be expensive for high-quality freelancers.
- Quality of work can vary.
- Project management support is not included.
- Freelancers may not always be available for long-term projects.
- It may require more effort to vet and manage freelancers.
Comparison Table: Guru vs Fiverr vs Upwork
Criteria | Guru | Fiverr | Upwork |
---|---|---|---|
Vetting Process | Moderate | Minimal | Comprehensive |
Quality Consistency | Moderate | Variable | High |
Project Management | Included | Not included | Optional |
Cost Efficiency | High | Low | Moderate |
Client Retention | 70% | 60% | 75% |
5. Freelancer
- Foundation Year: 2009
- Hourly Rate: $15 - $100
- Tech Stack: PHP, Python, Java, JavaScript, C#, and more.
- Statistics: 50 million users, 19 million jobs posted
Pros:
- A large pool of freelancers offers a wide range of skills.
- Competitive pricing can be cost-effective.
- A diverse range of services beyond just software development.
- Secure platform with numerous tools for project management.
- Long-established platform with a large user base.
Cons:
- The quality of freelancers can be inconsistent.
- High competition among freelancers may affect project timelines.
- The complex fee structure can be confusing.
- Project management support is optional and may incur extra costs.
- It may require significant effort to find and vet top-quality freelancers.
Comparison Table: Freelancer vs Fiverr vs Upwork
Criteria | Freelancer | Fiverr | Upwork |
---|---|---|---|
Vetting Process | Moderate | Minimal | Comprehensive |
Quality Consistency | Variable | Variable | High |
Project Management | Optional | Not included | Optional |
Cost Efficiency | High | Low | Moderate |
Client Retention | 75% | 60% | 75% |
6. CodementorX
- Foundation Year: 2014
- Hourly Rate: $60 - $120
- Tech Stack: Python, JavaScript, Ruby, PHP, Java, and more.
- Statistics: 8,000 vetted developers, 300,000+ sessions
Pros:
- Top-tier developers ensure high-quality work.
- Strong community support provides additional resources.
- Focus on mentorship and collaboration improves outcomes.
- A high client retention rate indicates satisfaction.
- A comprehensive vetting process ensures reliable talent.
Cons:
- Higher costs compared to many other platforms.
- Smaller talent pool due to selective vetting.
- Limited to specific tech stacks.
- It may not be cost-effective for non-technical roles.
- Project management support might add to the cost.
Comparison Table: CodementorX vs Fiverr vs Upwork
Criteria | CodementorX | Fiverr | Upwork |
---|---|---|---|
Vetting Process | Rigorous | Minimal | Comprehensive |
Quality Consistency | High | Variable | High |
Project Management | Included | Not included | Optional |
Cost Efficiency | Moderate | Low | Moderate |
Client Retention | 90% | 60% | 75% |
7. X-Team
- Foundation Year: 2006
- Hourly Rate: $50 - $100
- Tech Stack: JavaScript, PHP, Ruby, Python, Java, and more.
- Statistics: Trusted by Fortune 500 companies, 90% developer retention rate.
Pros:
- Dedicated teams ensure focused and cohesive project work.
- High retention rates of developers indicate reliability.
- Emphasis on developer growth improves long-term outcomes.
- Trusted by Fortune 500 companies.
- A comprehensive vetting process ensures high-quality talent.
Cons:
- Higher rates compared to many other platforms.
- Limited to long-term projects may not suit short-term needs.
- The onboarding process can be lengthy.
- Initial costs may be higher due to the dedicated team setup.
- Limited availability for non-technical roles.
Comparison Table: X-Team vs Fiverr vs Upwork
Criteria | X-Team | Fiverr | Upwork |
---|---|---|---|
Vetting Process | Rigorous | Minimal | Comprehensive |
Quality Consistency | Very high | Variable | High |
Project Management | Included | Not included | Optional |
Cost Efficiency | Moderate | Low | Moderate |
Client Retention | 95% | 60% | 75% |
8. Gun.io
- Foundation Year: 2011
- Hourly Rate: $75 - $150
- Tech Stack: Python, JavaScript, Ruby, PHP, Java, and more.
- Statistics: 97% customer satisfaction rate, used by Fortune 500 companies
Pros:
- A strict vetting process ensures top-quality freelancers.
- Focus on US-based talent offers timezone advantages.
- A high client satisfaction rate indicates reliability.
- Comprehensive project management support.
- Trusted by major companies, indicating credibility.
Cons:
- Premium pricing may be prohibitive for small businesses.
- Limited to North American talent, reducing global options.
- Smaller talent pool due to selective vetting.
- It may not be cost-effective for smaller projects.
- Project onboarding may take longer.
Criteria | Gun.io | Fiverr | Upwork |
---|---|---|---|
Vetting Process | Very rigorous | Minimal | Comprehensive |
Quality Consistency | Very high | Variable | High |
Project Management | Included | Not included | Optional |
Cost Efficiency | Low | Low | Moderate |
Client Retention | 97% | 60% | 75% |
9. Arc.dev
- Foundation Year: 2013
- Hourly Rate: $60 - $120
- Tech Stack: Python, JavaScript, Ruby, PHP, Java, and more.
- Statistics: 70% of developers placed within 1 week, used by 10,000+ companies
Pros:
- A thorough vetting process ensures high-quality talent.
- Remote-ready developers offer flexibility.
- Large global talent pool.
- High client satisfaction rate.
- Comprehensive project management support.
Cons:
- Higher costs compared to other platforms.
- Limited to specific tech stacks.
- The onboarding process may take longer.
- May not be cost-effective for non-technical roles.
- Smaller talent pool due to selective vetting.
Comparison Table: Arc.dev vs Fiverr vs Upwork
Criteria | Arc.dev | Fiverr | Upwork |
---|---|---|---|
Vetting Process | Rigorous | Minimal | Comprehensive |
Quality Consistency | High | Variable | High |
Project Management | Optional | Not included | Optional |
Cost Efficiency | Moderate | Low | Moderate |
Client Retention | 85% | 60% | 75% |
10. Lemon.io
- Foundation Year: 2015
- Hourly Rate: $20 - $70
- Tech Stack: JavaScript, Python, Ruby, PHP, Java, and more.
- Statistics: 95% success rate, 500+ clients served
Pros:
- Affordable rates for high-quality work.
- The fast hiring process saves time.
- Rigorous vetting ensures quality assurance.
- High client retention rate.
- Strong focus on customer satisfaction.
Cons:
- Limited to specific regions, reducing global options.
- Smaller talent pool compared to larger platforms.
- Higher competition among freelancers may affect project timelines.
- Project management support may add to costs.
- Limited availability for non-technical roles.
Comparison Table: Lemon.io vs Fiverr vs Upwork
Criteria | Lemon.io | Fiverr | Upwork |
---|---|---|---|
Vetting Process | Rigorous | Minimal | Comprehensive |
Quality Consistency | High | Variable | High |
Project Management | Included | Not included | Optional |
Cost Efficiency | High | Low | Moderate |
Client Retention | 95% | 60% | 75% |
Conclusion
While Fiverr and Upwork offer affordable and straightforward services, they often need to improve quality, reliability, and security. The Fiverr and Upwork alternatives presented in this blog, such as Smart Working, are tailored to overcome these shortcomings. For instance, Smart Working provides rigorous vetting and robust project management, addressing concerns about quality and client satisfaction.
These platforms offer more specialised solutions, with enhanced screening processes and better project management, making them more suitable for businesses that require high-quality, reliable, and secure offshore development services.
Related Articles

Excited to make your first hire?
We’re ready to assist you to take the first step toward building a brighter future with the best talent by your side.
-
Hire in 10 days
-
Vetted and Screened Talent
-
£25/hr (all-in)